Since starting this site, I’m still really surprised when people are skeptical about global warming. Maybe people will always (and often rightly so) feel compelled to take a view which goes against popular belief, even if just to be different. There are some interesting points though and reading this debate shows how there are many people who just don’t follow the GW doctrine.
July 19th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
Think of what you’re saying. Earth’s climate has always changed for reasons we still don’t understand and well before Man existed. The logical position is that this is a natural occurrence. The extraordinary position is that a 3% increase in co2 emissions ( Man’s contribution) is responsible for global havoc. If we still do not know why and how the Earth cooled and heated up in the past how we could we be so sure it’s not natural now? Why do you people wish it to be the fault of Man so badly that you demean the logical conclusions of your fellow man?